
III.1.
Are the six sense faculties.
The area of their concern is that which is seen heard, smelled and so forth.
III.2.
Now if it does not see its own self, how can it possibly see something else?
III.3.
On the contrary, that example of fire together with vision is refuted by the analysis of “present going to,” “that which is already gone to,” and “that which is not yet gone to.”
III.4.
How, then, is it possible to say: Vision sees?
III.5.
Nevertheless, it is explained that also the “seer” is to be known only by his vision.
III.6.
Therefore, if there is no “seer,” how can there be vision and the object seen?
III.7.
Knowledge is said to occur presupposing the eye being dependent on the visible forms.
III.8.
there is no four-fold consequence: knowledge, etc. cognitive sensation, affective sensation, and “desire”.
Also, then, how will the acquisition (upadana) of karma and its consequences i.e., existence, birth, aging, and death be produced?
III.9.
Indeed one should not apprehend the “hearer,” “what is heard,” etc. as self-existent entities.
Source: Orientalia