Home Teachings Fundamental texts Fundamental Verses on the Middle Way (XV) — by Nagarjuna

Fundamental Verses on the Middle Way (XV) — by Nagarjuna

53
0

Arya Nargarjuna

Mulamadhyamaka-karikas

Fundamentals of the Central Philosophy of Buddhism

Nagarjuna17-17.jpg
Section 15: An Analysis of a Self-existent Thing (being and non-being)

XV.1. The production of a self-existent thing by a conditioning cause is not possible,
For, being produced through dependence on a cause, a self-existent thing would be “something which is produced” (krtaka).

XV.2. How, indeed, will a self-existent thing become “something which is produced”?
Certainly, a self-existent thing by definition is “not-produced” and is independent of anything else.

XV.3. If there is an absence of a self-existent thing, how will an other-existent thing (parabhava) come into being ?
Certainly the self-existence of an other-existent thing is called ”other-existence.”

XV.4. Further, how can a thing exist without either self-existence or other-existence?
If either self-existence or other existence exist, then an existing thing, indeed, would be proved.

XV.5. If there is no proof of an existent thing, then a non-existent thing cannot be proved.
Since people call the other-existence of an existent thing a “non-existent thing.”

XV.6. Those who perceive self-existence and other-existence, and an existent thing and a non-existent thing,
Do not perceive the true nature of the Buddha’s teaching.

XV.7. In “The Instruction of Katyayana” both “it is” and “it is not” are opposed
By the Glorious One, who has ascertained the meaning of “existent” and non-existent.”

XV.8. If there would be an existent thing by its own nature, there could not be “non-existence’ of that thing.
Certainly an existent thing different from its own nature would never obtain.

XV.9. An opponent asks:
If there is no basic self-nature (prakti), of what will there be “otherness”?
Nargarjuna answers:
If there is basic self-nature, of what will there be “otherness”?

XV.10. “It is” is a notion of eternity. “It is not” is a nihilistic view.
Therefore, one who is wise does not have recourse to “being” or “non-being.”

XV.11. That which exists by its own nature is eternal since “it does not not-exist.”
If it is maintained: “That which existed before does not exist now,” there annihilation would logically follow.


Source: Orientalia

Previous articleBuddhist poet Merwin named to poet post
Next articleFundamental Verses on the Middle Way (XVI) — by Nagarjuna